Ethereum has a fees problem. It presents a challenge. A dilemma of some sorts. On one hand, supporters are gleeful, excited of this “good problem.”

There are many metrics that gauges the performance of a blockchain project. Chief amongst this is the community, and understandably so.

The goal of blockchain is to distribute and decentralize. This gives its application an edge against, say, censorship and other attempts to muzzle distribution or broadcast.

Scalability. It’s a headache for public blockchain developers. And yes, Ethereum is one of them. Resolving, or creating a solution that immediately rolls out permanent solution

Ethereum activity continues to increase going into Serenity. While there might be hitches and delays—which are typical of open source blockchain projects, the fact that developers

Ethereum market performance over the last few days has been steady. At the back of this were reports that Visa, after mentioning Ethereum several times on

The next three years will shape Ethereum. That the protocol triggered some sort of a revolution, the fourth industrial revolution, is also true. Behind the standard’s

Approaching Ethereum requires a multi-faceted approach. There is the inevitable price aspect, true, but what’s truly important for true believers is what developers have in mind.

Blockchain is nothing without a community. This has been repeatedly drilled down on us. For newbies, the oldies do nothing but reiterate. However, while the community

There are many forms of centralization. Miner centralization is the most rampant. Here, in a Proof-of-Work consensus system, mining gear is concentrated in zones with low