TLDR
- The IBIT fund is the only capital inflow leader with a negative annual return (-9.59%).
- Despite the decline, the iShares Bitcoin Trust outperformed gold funds in terms of capital inflows.
- Total net assets of Bitcoin ETFs fell from a peak of $150 billion to $114 billion.
For the BlackRock Bitcoin ETF, the year ends with a financial paradox. It certainly established itself as one of the most successful financial products in terms of capital attraction—successfully pulling in approximately $25.4 billion—yet the IBIT fund recorded a cumulative drop of 9.59%.
In this regard, Eric Balchunas stated that this is the only fund on the list of leaders by capital flow to show performance in the red so far in 2025.
$IBIT is the only ETF on the 2025 Flow Leaderboard with a negative return for the year. CT's knee-jerk reaction is to whine about the return but the real takeaway is that is was 6th place DESPITE the negative return (Boomers putting on a HODL clinic). Even took in more than $GLD… pic.twitter.com/68uq3HFRuO
— Eric Balchunas (@EricBalchunas) December 19, 2025
This phenomenon reflects a dramatic shift in risk appetite among institutional investors during the fourth quarter. Following an euphoric start to the year, the crypto-asset market entered a prolonged correction phase, causing initial enthusiasm to transform into a defensive and cautious stance.

Disconnect Between Institutional Flows and Market Performance
The slowdown is not exclusive to a single product. The global exchange-traded fund market has felt the impact of a massive retreat; the total net assets of Bitcoin ETFs dropped from a peak of $150 billion to $114 billion. This $36 billion loss in total valuation is due to both the depreciation of the underlying asset and net capital outflows recorded between November and December.
The Coinbase Premium Index is a key indicator of this behavior, and during the last quarter, it has remained mostly in negative territory. This suggests that large U.S. entities took a step back, actively reducing their exposure or selling positions.
However, the fact that the BlackRock Bitcoin ETF captured more capital than gold funds—even though the latter rose by 64%—demonstrates long-term conviction.
In summary, IBIT’s decline seems to be a matter of timing rather than structural erosion. Market history suggests that flows tend to recover once the price of Bitcoin stabilizes, setting the stage for a potential revival of institutional demand in 2026.