CFTC Issues No‑Action Relief Allowing Phantom to Explore Derivatives Access Through Its Wallet

The CFTC issued no-action relief letting Phantom explore wallet-based derivatives access under strict conditions, without full broker registration for now.
Table of Contents

TL;DR

  • The CFTC’s market-oversight staff said it would not recommend enforcement against Phantom for failing to register as an introducing broker and associated-persons while it tests derivatives access.
  • Phantom must keep users onboarded directly with collaborators, provide conflict and risk disclosures, and follow strict marketing and recordkeeping conditions.
  • The relief is narrow, revocable and conditional, but it opens a path for wallet-based access to regulated derivatives markets in the United States.

Phantom has moved closer to regulated derivatives without becoming a broker, and the CFTC’s no-action relief marks an opening for crypto wallets trying to bridge into market plumbing. The agency’s Division of Market Oversight said it would not recommend enforcement action against Phantom for failing to register as an introducing broker, or against staff for failing to register as associated persons, if the company proceeds under a defined set of activities and conditions. That gives Phantom room to test a derivatives access feature through its wallet while avoiding a registration burden, at least for now.

The relief is narrow, but it still redraws the line between wallets and market access

What makes the relief notable is how carefully it separates software access from actual trading intermediation. The CFTC described Phantom as a self-custodial wallet provider whose software runs across major blockchains including Bitcoin, Ethereum and Solana, and emphasized that the company would only passively provide software enabling users to send orders directly to collaborators. Phantom would not exercise discretion over routing, generate explicit buy or sell signals, or affirmatively involve itself in particular orders. In practical terms, the regulator is allowing a wallet interface to sit closer to derivatives activity without calling it a broker.

The CFTC’s market-oversight staff said it would not recommend enforcement against Phantom for failing to register as an introducing broker and associated-persons while it tests derivatives access.

The permission, however, comes wrapped in conditions that show the CFTC is not giving Phantom a free pass so much as testing a regulatory perimeter. Phantom must provide users with disclosures about conflicts of interest and trading risks, ensure users are onboarded directly with the collaborator, and maintain compliance policies for communications and marketing as if it were a registered introducing broker. The company also cannot engage in promotions that would require pre-approval under NFA rules. Those limits make the relief look less like deregulation and more like supervised experimentation under a formal warning label.

The broader significance is that U.S. regulators are starting to acknowledge crypto wallets as potential gateways to regulated financial products, not just containers for tokens. Phantom and each collaborator must accept joint and several liability for violations tied to the proposed activity, file undertakings with the CFTC, maintain records, and notify the agency in the event of insolvency or bankruptcy. The position is not binding on the full Commission and can be modified, suspended or withdrawn. Even so, the message is unmistakable: the door to wallet-based derivatives access has opened, but only a few inches.

RELATED POSTS

Ads

Follow us on Social Networks

Crypto Tutorials

Crypto Reviews