TLDR
- The ecosystem’s 21 largest entities now control 2.75 million BTC, equivalent to 13.1% of the circulating supply.
- MicroStrategy and the United States Government led the accumulation, adding more than 350,000 BTC between them.
- New institutional players such as Metaplanet and Twenty One Capital broke into the ranking of the largest holders.
The landscape of Bitcoin ownership in 2025 underwent a radical transformation toward institutional centralization. Recent data reveals that the world’s 21 largest wallets aggressively increased their reserves, adding a total of approximately 476,000 BTC throughout 2025.
This behavior illustrates a clear trend: while retail participation remains fragmented, large corporations and states are consolidating their control over the asset’s limited supply.
MicroStrategy, one of the protagonists of this shift, reaffirmed itself as the undisputed corporate titan by expanding its reserve by 226,000 BTC, reaching a total of 672,000 units.
On the other hand, Bitcoin ownership in 2025 by sovereign entities saw a historic spike with the United States, which increased its holdings by 130,000 BTC, raising its digital treasury to nearly 328,000 BTC.
New Players and Miner Resilience in Bitcoin Ownership in 2025
2025 was marked by the arrival of new heavyweight players. Firms such as Metaplanet and BSTR managed to enter the elite group of the top 21 holders after accumulating massive positions in record time.
Additionally, public mining companies like MARA and CleanSpark decided to retain their production instead of liquidating, reinforcing the thesis that Bitcoin ownership in 2025 is viewed as a long-term store-of-value strategy by producers.
In contrast to the massive accumulation at the top, selling pressure was highly localized. For instance, Binance reduced its holdings by 35,000 BTC, a sharp contrast to the bullish behavior of corporate balance sheets.
This divergence suggests that Bitcoin ownership in 2025 transitioned from being a widely distributed speculative asset to one anchored in solid institutional balance sheets. In the coming years, this more concentrated ownership structure could reduce available liquidity, making the market much more sensitive to the movements of these major players.
