TL;DR:
- The XRPscan explorer records 14,403,762 XRP tokens destroyed since network inception through its burn mechanism.
- That tally of eliminated tokens represents 0.014% of the protocol’s fixed total supply of 100 billion units.
- The ledger’s base transaction fees remain at a fraction of a U.S. cent for every processed transaction.
David Schwartz, Ripple CTO Emeritus, defended the XRP Ledger fee model against community proposals that recommend increasing transfer costs to accelerate the reduction of the token supply.
I think fee revenue is a terrible metric since it measures how much friction the chain *didn't* remove. If you represent the people who collect the fees, then fees are great. But what about the people who *pay* the fees? Who cares about their interests?
— David 'JoelKatz' Schwartz (@JoelKatz) October 4, 2026
An X user triggered the debate by pointing out that analysts and institutional investors gauge the relevance of Layer 1 blockchains by their total fee revenue. Under that standard, XRP Ledger posts modest figures because its operating costs amount to just a fraction of a cent.
Within the protocol’s technical architecture, network fees are neither distributed to validators nor allocated to staking pools. The codebase permanently destroys every fraction collected, applying direct deflationary pressure on the fixed total supply of 100 billion XRP tokens.
The user suggested that validators could vote to raise the base fee tenfold to a hundredfold. In their view, an adjustment on that scale would still keep costs below one cent while accelerating the asset’s burn rate.
David Schwartz rejected gross fee revenue as a primary benchmark for assessing the health of decentralized infrastructure. For the executive, capturing large fee totals suggests the network has failed to eliminate frictional costs for system participants.
Schwartz argued that high revenues solely benefit those who collect the fees, sidelining the practical needs of end users who fund capital transfers.

Debate Over Valuation Metrics and Institutional Adoption
The technical exchange reopened discussions on whether Layer 1 networks should be architected to maximize token burns or prioritize low-cost transfers at scale.
Data from XRPscan shows that 14,403,762 XRP have been eliminated since the genesis block. Market analysts note that this measured pace is a direct consequence of the low transaction fees built into the ledger by design.
The fundamental design of XRP Ledger is built to power cross-border payments and near-instant institutional settlement. Protocol documentation underscores that deliberately raising transaction costs could disincentivize real-world asset integration and the issuance of tokenized instruments by financial institutions.
Any modification to the ledger’s base fee requires the activation of a technical amendment supported by a minimum 80% consensus among independent validators over an uninterrupted two-week window.
The XRP Ledger technical community maintains regular voting on rippled validator software amendments throughout this current quarter of 2026, a process during which operators decide which governance updates and operational parameters are introduced into the ledger.





