As the crypto market continues to consolidate, market commentators are reassessing which tokens could see increased interest going into the final quarter of 2025. Traditional names like XRP and Stellar (XLM) have been trading within relatively narrow ranges.
Alongside these established networks, a newer project, Remittix (RTX), has been mentioned in some “best crypto to buy now” style coverage. According to the project’s public materials, its token sale has raised more than $24.2 million to date.
What analysts are watching in Remittix coverage
Remittix has been cited by some commentators as part of the broader cross-border payments narrative. Supporters argue that the project is attempting to address consumer and business payment use cases that other networks have also targeted over time, while XRP and Stellar remain closely tied to institutional adoption and evolving regulatory considerations.
In project materials, Remittix describes a wallet and payments infrastructure that would allow users and businesses to send funds to 30+ countries using 40+ cryptocurrencies. The project also states that transfers can settle quickly and that fees and conversion rates are presented transparently; these claims have not been independently verified in this article.
Remittix also references a Pay API intended for platforms that want to support crypto-to-bank payments. Any assessment of adoption or product-market fit remains speculative at this stage, particularly for early-stage projects.
XRP and Stellar: recent price context
After rallies in July, XRP and XLM have been trading around key technical levels, with traders watching for clearer directional catalysts.
Some market participants are monitoring whether XRP can move out of its recent consolidation range around $2.80–$2.85. Commentary has also referenced legal developments and broader discussion around potential exchange-traded products, including ETF approval buzz, though outcomes remain uncertain.
XRP Price Chart | Source: CoinGecko
XLM has also remained range-bound. Despite holding near a long-term support area around $0.34, it has struggled to move beyond roughly $0.40 over recent months, reflecting limited near-term catalysts.
While XRP and XLM continue to feature in cross-border settlement narratives, early-stage projects like RTX are often discussed in parallel by commentators. However, fundraising totals and project announcements should not be treated as indicators of future market performance.
Token sale claims and market-risk considerations
Some commentary around RTX has included aggressive price projections. Such estimates are inherently uncertain and should be treated as speculation rather than analysis of guaranteed outcomes. Tokens sold through a token sale may also carry additional risks, including liquidity constraints, execution risk, and volatility once trading begins.
Supporters commonly cite several points when discussing the project:
- Early-stage status: As described by the project, RTX is still in a token-sale phase, and its valuation and market conditions may change materially if and when secondary-market trading occurs.
- Use-case focus: The project positions itself around remittances and payments; real-world adoption, competition, and compliance requirements remain key unknowns.
- Exchange-related statements: Any references to exchange listings should be independently verified by readers via official exchange announcements.
- Fundraising: The project reports raising more than $24.2 million; fundraising size alone does not predict delivery, demand, or price performance.
Readers comparing XRP, XLM, and newer projects should consider differences in maturity, market structure, transparency, and risk profile.
Project links (for reference):
Website: https://remittix.io/
Socials: https://linktr.ee/remittix
This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial or investment advice. This outlet is not affiliated with the project mentioned. Information related to the token sale and product features is based on project-provided materials and should be independently verified.
