Market observers are debating whether a new crypto market upswing could emerge in 2025 as liquidity conditions and risk sentiment shift. However, outcomes remain uncertain, and narratives around “the next big winner” often depend on assumptions that may not play out. This article reviews several tokens that have been discussed in that context, including early-stage token sales and established networks.
From meme-driven communities like BullZilla to networks such as TON and HBAR, these digital assets are often cited as examples of different approaches to product design and adoption. Below is a look at nine projects mentioned in 2025 discussions.
1. BullZilla ($BZIL): Token-sale claims and reported figures
BullZilla ($BZIL) describes itself as a meme-coin project with a staged token-sale structure. Project materials referenced by third parties claim the sale has multiple stages and has reported fundraising totals, token distributions, and holder counts; those figures are not independently verified in this article.
The project also publishes token-sale pricing and stage-by-stage changes. Any projections about listing prices or future returns are inherently speculative and should not be treated as assurances of performance. Readers should also note that token supply dynamics and staged pricing do not guarantee market demand, liquidity, or price appreciation after a token begins trading.
A CoinTelegraph discussion has previously described “structured token sales” as appealing to some participants due to clearer disclosure of pricing steps; this is not a guarantee of outcomes for any specific project.
Token-sale timeline (as described by the project)
BullZilla uses marketing terms for its sale phases and stages, including references to an upcoming “Roar Drop.” These labels are part of the project’s promotional narrative and should be interpreted as branding rather than evidence of future performance.
2. WLFI (World Liberty Financial): Bridging TradFi and DeFi
WLFI (World Liberty Financial) positions itself as a project focused on connecting traditional finance concepts with decentralized markets. It says it aims to enable blockchain users to trade on-chain representations of real-world assets such as major equities.
The project also describes staking and yield-related mechanisms intended to support liquidity. According to Decrypt, WLFI’s on-chain transaction volume increased in Q3 2025; readers should treat such figures as reporting that may depend on methodology and data sources.
As with any project referencing tokenized securities or stock-linked products, regulatory treatment and user protections may vary by jurisdiction and platform design.
3. MoonBull (MOBU): Meme branding with on-chain features
MoonBull is presented as a meme-themed token built on Ethereum that, according to its materials, includes features such as staking, referral programs, liquidity locking, and DAO governance.
The project also describes token-burning and other supply-related mechanisms. Whether these features translate into sustained usage or market demand depends on execution, security, liquidity, and broader market conditions.
4. La Culex (CULEX): Multi-chain DeFi concept
La Culex is described as an early-stage DeFi project focused on cross-chain liquidity, with references to connecting networks such as Ethereum, BNB Chain, and Polygon. Project materials also claim the use of AI-assisted contract logic to manage liquidity parameters.
Claims about reducing impermanent loss or delivering “stable” yields should be treated cautiously; outcomes for liquidity providers and stakers can vary widely with volatility, smart-contract risk, and liquidity conditions.
5. Toncoin (TON): A blockchain ecosystem linked to Telegram distribution
Toncoin (TON) is part of The Open Network ecosystem, which has benefited from distribution through Telegram-related wallets, mini apps, and community integrations. Its reach is sometimes framed in relation to Telegram’s large global user base, although conversion from users to on-chain activity is not guaranteed.
In 2025, TON’s ecosystem has highlighted features such as payments, naming services, and storage tooling. CoinDesk has reported changes in TON’s TVL over time; TVL is a volatile metric and can change quickly with market prices and incentive programs.
For readers comparing networks, it may be helpful to distinguish between adoption claims, developer activity, and actual user retention.
6. Bitcoin Cash (BCH): Renewed attention to payments
Bitcoin Cash (BCH) continues to position itself around peer-to-peer payments. It is often cited for relatively low transaction fees and quick confirmations compared with some other networks, though fees and performance can vary with network conditions.
Reports of partnerships with payment platforms and crypto ATMs can signal distribution efforts, but real-world usage depends on merchant adoption, user demand, and local regulation. Forbes has reported changes in active addresses in 2025; active-address metrics are directional and do not always map cleanly to unique users.
7. Litecoin (LTC): A long-running network with incremental upgrades
Litecoin (LTC) remains one of the older cryptocurrencies in the market and is frequently used as a reference point for payment-focused networks due to its block times and established infrastructure.
Network events such as halvings reduce issuance over time, while integrations (including privacy-related features and payment-provider support) may affect usage patterns. Bloomberg has highlighted Litecoin’s network activity in 2025; activity metrics can fluctuate with market conditions and exchange behavior.
8. Sui (SUI): Developer-focused Layer-1 design
Sui, developed by Mysten Labs, is a Layer-1 blockchain that emphasizes scalability through parallel transaction execution. Its architecture is often discussed in the context of high-throughput applications.
The network’s Move-based development stack has attracted some developers, and partnerships in areas such as gaming, NFTs, and DeFi have been highlighted in public announcements. As with other Layer-1 ecosystems, adoption depends on sustained developer activity, tooling maturity, and user demand.
CoinTelegraph has characterized Sui as a scalable infrastructure effort; such descriptions are editorial opinions rather than guarantees.
9. Hedera (HBAR): Enterprise-oriented network claims
Hedera (HBAR) uses a hashgraph-based consensus model and positions itself around enterprise use cases, emphasizing throughput and energy efficiency. Its governance model has included corporate participants, which proponents cite as relevant for institutional experimentation.
Some reporting has referenced Hedera’s inclusion in pilots related to cross-border payment experimentation. Decrypt has reported large transaction counts on the network in 2025; transaction totals can reflect a mix of enterprise, consumer, and automated activity and should be interpreted in context.
As with other enterprise-focused networks, the key question is whether pilots and proofs of concept convert into sustained, economically meaningful activity.
Conclusion
Crypto market cycles and individual token performance are unpredictable. The projects above span early-stage token-sale concepts and established networks with different maturity levels, liquidity profiles, and risk factors.
Readers evaluating any token sale, staking program, or ecosystem narrative may want to focus on verifiable disclosures (team, audits, token distribution, vesting, liquidity arrangements), as well as the legal and technical risks that can affect outcomes.
Project links (for reference):
Follow BZIL on X (Formerly Twitter)
FAQs
What is BullZilla’s staged token-sale structure?
According to project materials, BullZilla uses multiple sale stages with different listed prices and allocations. Such structures do not guarantee market performance after trading begins.
Why is WLFI gaining attention?
WLFI is discussed in relation to on-chain representations of traditional assets and DeFi-style liquidity mechanisms. Any claims about volume or adoption should be reviewed alongside the underlying data and methodology.
Is MoonBull more than just a meme coin?
MoonBull presents itself as a meme-branded token with governance and staking-related features. Whether those features result in long-term usage depends on execution, security, and market demand.
What is La Culex’s main idea?
La Culex is described as a multi-chain liquidity concept with AI-assisted parameter management. Any discussion of “yield optimization” is not a guarantee of returns and may involve material risk.
Why is TON often discussed alongside Telegram?
TON-related products can be distributed through Telegram-adjacent experiences, which may lower onboarding friction. Adoption still depends on user interest and sustained application usage.
What factors are discussed around Litecoin in 2025?
No outcome is assured. Litecoin’s long operating history and integrations are factors some market participants monitor, but price and usage can change quickly with broader conditions.
Glossary
Token sale: A fundraising event in which tokens are offered before broader public trading begins.
ROI: Return on Investment, a way of expressing gain or loss relative to an initial cost.
DeFi: Decentralized finance; financial applications built on blockchain networks.
Layer-1 Blockchain: A base network that can host applications and other protocols.
Liquidity Pool: Pooled assets used to facilitate trading on decentralized exchanges.
This outlet is not affiliated with the project mentioned. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial or investment advice.
