{"id":158131,"date":"2023-12-06T12:31:22","date_gmt":"2023-12-06T12:31:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/crypto-economy.com\/?p=158131"},"modified":"2023-12-14T09:10:28","modified_gmt":"2023-12-14T09:10:28","slug":"bitcoin-developer-asserts-that-brc-20-tokens-and-ordinals-will-soon-cease-to-exist","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/crypto-economy.com\/bitcoin-developer-asserts-that-brc-20-tokens-and-ordinals-will-soon-cease-to-exist\/","title":{"rendered":"Bitcoin Developer Asserts That BRC-20 Tokens and Ordinals Will Soon Cease to Exist"},"content":{"rendered":"

Luke Dashjr, a prominent Bitcoin<\/a> developer, sparked controversy by calling for the deactivation of “inscriptions” due to a vulnerability being exploited in Bitcoin Core<\/strong>. This vulnerability allows for spam on the blockchain by bypassing limits set for the size of additional data in transactions.<\/p>\n

The uniqueness of this vulnerability lies in how “inscriptions” can circumvent the limits on additional data size<\/strong>. Since 2013, BTC Core has allowed users to set limits using the datacarriersize parameter. However, “inscriptions” manage to bypass these limits by disguising their data as program code, enabling them to inflate transaction sizes and, consequently, generate spam on the blockchain.<\/p>\n

\n

PSA: \u201cInscriptions\u201d are exploiting a vulnerability in #Bitcoin<\/a> Core to spam the blockchain. Bitcoin Core has, since 2013, allowed users to set a limit on the size of extra data in transactions they relay or mine (`-datacarriersize`). By obfuscating their data as program code,\u2026<\/p>\n

— Luke Dashjr (@LukeDashjr) December 6, 2023<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n